On Tue, Feb 23, 1999 at 04:16:26PM +0100, Eivind Eklund wrote:
> > Somehow this strikes me as a Bad Thing...
>
> It _is_ a bad thing. I've been pondering what to do with the
> intrusive invariant checks - make them dependent on
> INTRUSIVE_INVARIANTS, perhaps?
Depends on how dangerous these invariant violations are, I would think.
Iow, do they justify a panic()?
> That would still make some KLDs incompatible with INTRUSIVE_INVARIANTS, but
> that is probably the best we can do.
At least that way the non-intrusive ones can be left in (and still be useful).
Cheers,
--
Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/ "Reliability means never
_/ _/ _/ having to say you're sorry."
_/ _/_/_/ -- D. J. Bernstein
_/ _/ _/ _/
jos.bac...@nl.origin-it.com _/_/ _/_/_/ use Std::Disclaimer;
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
