Hi:
    Sorry for my lack of clarity. What I meant was that we DO need control
on the cvsup updates. I am perfectly happy with the way the FreeBSD team
runs the show.

Rick

----- Original Message -----
From: Wilko Bulte <wi...@yedi.iaf.nl>
To: Rick Whitesel <rwhite...@nbase-xyplex.com>
Cc: <garba...@hooked.net>; <wghi...@bellsouth.net>; <gr...@unixhelp.org>;
<d...@newsguy.com>; <j...@zippy.cdrom.com>; <curr...@freebsd.org>;
<wghi...@wghicks.bellsouth.net>
Sent: Monday, April 19, 1999 2:12 PM
Subject: Re: newbus and modem(s)


As Rick Whitesel wrote ...
> Hi:
>     Just wanted to say that I think the lack of a free-for-all CVS is
> exactly what is required to consistently move FreeBSD forward. If someone

Free-for-all as in 'everybody can do commits' ?

This is a joke I hope. There already exists such a thing. It is called Linux
(and even there the kernel is controlled).

> feels they would like to take a different approach, then I say by all
means
> do so. If you can convince people to join your development effort then
> great!, if not, then great!.
>
> Rick Whitesel
> Scientist
> NBase-Xyplex
> rwhite...@nbase-xyplex.com

Groeten / Cheers,
Wilko
_     ______________________________________________________________________
 |   / o / /  _  Arnhem, The Netherlands
 |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte WWW  : http://www.tcja.nl
_______________________ Powered by FreeBSD ___  http://www.freebsd.org _____



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to