Brooks Davis <[email protected]> writes:
> http://wiki.freebsd.org/201005ToolchainSummitSummary

"No new functionality that requires clang/llvm."

How about "No new functionality with non-trivial incompatibilities with
clang/llvm"?

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [email protected]
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"

Reply via email to