On 16.07.2012 15:05, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> 2. I am not sure if I like the approach of moving partition tasting code >>> into >>> common ZFS code (zfs.c). On one hand, it now makes sense because the new >>> partition iteration code is machine-independent. On the other hand, the >>> reason >>> that I added arch_zfs_probe method was to give platforms full control over >>> which >>> partitions and in what order are probed. It seems to be important for some >>> of them. >>> So, I like how your new partition interface makes it much easier to >>> ZFS-probe >>> partitions, but I would prefer to have that code in arch_zfs_probe >>> implementations >>> rather than in zfs_probe_dev. >> >> From the other point of view, ZFS is not a just file system and it works >> directly with disks and partitions. And it seems to me this code will be >> common >> for other architectures. > > Well, it seems that you haven't yet touched sparc64_zfs_probe.
Yes. It should work as before. But if Marius can suggest how to change ofw_disk.c to get disk size and sector size, then i will be able to break something here :) > If you'll find that you don't have to use any ugly hacks there, then good. > But my impression is that it would be easier to stick to the previous > approach. -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
