On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 11:24:50PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Matthew Dillon writes: > : complex. For example, using fixed-length FIFOs rather then linked lists. > : The writer manipulates the write index variable, the reader manipulates > : the read index variable. No locking is required between reader and > : writer. > > What about wrap around? You mean queue empty or queue full? That's when you have to punt to a rate-limit mechanism. Dunno what that would be in interrupt context. -- Andrew To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphor... Nate Williams
- Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphor... Daniel Eischen
- Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphor... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphor... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphor... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphor... Brad Knowles
- Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphor... David Holloway
- Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphor... Warner Losh
- Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphores availa... Warner Losh
- Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphores available for driv... Warner Losh
- Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphores available for ... Andrew Reilly
- Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphores available for drivers? Warner Losh
- Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphores available for drivers? Matthew Dillon
- Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphores available for driv... Matthew Dillon