On Thursday, March 14, 2013 12:29:58 pm Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 09:42:40AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Thursday, March 14, 2013 4:44:20 am Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 08:28:25AM +0100, Dirk Engling wrote: > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > > > On 13.03.13 23:08, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > > > > > > > > > I think I considered something similar at first, but the change I > > > > > proposed was optimal, IMHO at the cost of producing pretty large > > > > > diff, because of indentation change. But to be sure, can you send a > > > > > patch of your proposed change? > > > > > > > > http://erdgeist.org/arts/software/Code/pidfile.c.diff > > > > > > Right. Your patch assumes EWOULDBLOCK is equal to EAGAIN, which is true > > > on FreeBSD, but is not portable. Also in case pidptr is NULL you compare > > > errno three times instead of just one (not a big deal of course, just > > > something that could be done a bit more optimal:)). > > > > Geeze, why not just add an else. That's the really short diff: > > Heh, I did consider that as well, but here you check errno twice, > instead of once. Guys, is there anything wrong with the patch I > proposed?
I'm sure the compiler can work that out just fine and it should do whatever is most readable to the programmer. I don't care either way. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
