On Sun, Apr 02, 2000 at 08:02:54PM +0200, Vallo Kallaste wrote: > Yes, but I don't have space for crashdump and I can't build new kernel > with limited memory usage because I don't have /usr filesystem up and > running. Is there a way to limit memory usage without recompiling > kernel? I can store 32MB crashdump at the moment, no separate /var > filesystem because I thought 4.0-RELEASE will be stable enough for > experimenting with vinum.. > I don't have another 4.0-RELEASE or stable system but I'll try to build > 4.0-R kernel on -current system. Just to clearify the things... Are these problems with 4.0-RELEASE with 4.0-STABLE or with 5.0-CURRENT? -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usergroup [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Bernd Walter
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Vallo Kallaste
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Vallo Kallaste
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Soren Schmidt
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Bernd Walter
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Soren Schmidt
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Vallo Kallaste
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Bernd Walter
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Bernd Walter
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Vallo Kallaste
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Bernd Walter
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Soren Schmidt
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Soren Schmidt
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Bernd Walter
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Soren Schmidt
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Greg Lehey
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Matthew Dillon
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Bernd Walter
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Vallo Kallaste