On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Gleb Smirnoff <gleb...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 12:11:02PM +0100, Erwin Lansing wrote: > E> > On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 01:41:01AM +0200, George Kontostanos wrote: > E> > G> > Am 03.11.2013 um 23:06 schrieb Gleb Smirnoff <gleb...@freebsd.org > >: > E> > G> > > E> > G> > > On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 10:05:02PM +0200, Özkan KIRIK wrote: > E> > G> > > Ö> Altough bind removed from FreeBSD 10 distribution, > "/etc/rc.d/named" > E> > G> > script > E> > G> > > Ö> still exists. > E> > G> > > Ö> and this script depends on "/etc/mtree/BIND.chroot.dist" > file but > E> > G> > there is > E> > G> > > Ö> no such file in source tree. > E> > G> > > Ö> I think this file was forgotten to be removed. > E> > G> > > Ö> > E> > G> > > Ö> And also, named_* definitions still exists in > /etc/defaults/rc.conf > E> > G> > file. > E> > G> > > > E> > G> > > Please review attached file that removes named from /etc. > E> > G> > > E> > G> > It would be great if the port would learn to install its own > script etc. > E> > G> > in time for that change. (Unless it’s already there, and I’m > just too blind > E> > G> > to see it.) > E> > G> > E> > G> No you are not blind. Installing bind from ports still relies on > the > E> > G> /etc/rc.d/named script. > E> > > E> > Erwin, can you please handle that? > E> > E> Things are much worse that this, the ports are completely written under > the assumption that there is a Bind in base, which of course would already > break with WITHOUT_BIND before Bind was completely removed. It will be > hard to fix without breaking the installed base of 8 and 9. Sigh. > E> > E> I'll try to work on it this week, but unfortunately have a full > schedule of meetings and travel as well. > Suggestion. An option to install the rc script would solve that problem. > > What should we do with src? > > IMO, we should proceed with removal of remnants of bind in src. In the > worst case, > if you can't handle it this week, the situation will be the following: > > 1) 8.x, 9.x users are okay > 2) 10+.x users w/o bind are okay > 3) 10+.x users with bind have problems > > If we skip updating src, then situation would be: > > 1) 8.x, 9.x users are okay > 2) 10+.x users w/o bind have problems > 3) 10+.x users with bind are okay > > I think, there are less 10.x users with bind, than 10.x without it. > > Please warn about this in UPDATING. I am personally use 12 FreeBSD servers as dedicated DNS servers only. > -- > Totus tuus, Glebius. > -- George Kontostanos --- http://www.aisecure.net _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"