On 19.11.13 08:23, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:00:55PM +0100, Andreas Tobler wrote: >> I prepared two patches, see below. The amd64 one is reviewed by bde@ and >> the i386 is compile tested by me (runtime is theoretically also done, >> but I'm not sure since I do not have 32-bit apps on my amd64). > Use cc -m32. > >> >> The amd64 is compile and runtime tested. The tools, nm, shows that we >> have the weak_references as before. >> >> If you agree I'd like to commit both within a few days to -CURRENT. If >> someone steps up and confirms that the i386 part also runs, would be >> great, but I expect it to work. >> >> If I'm correct, there is some similar work to be done on arm, mips and >> sparc64, I'm happy to do this if the people like to have it done. But I >> do not own either of them to test in native config. Except sparc64..... >> Here I have blech ;) >> >> >> Here the two patches >> amd64: >> http://people.freebsd.org/~andreast/weak_ref_amd64.diff >> i386: >> http://people.freebsd.org/~andreast/weak_ref_i386.diff > > Amd64 patch is fine. For i386, I do not see a definition of the > WEAK_REFERENCE in the patch, and quick search of the pre-existing > definition in sys/i386 or lib/libc/i386 does not reveal anything.
It's there now. Updated the diff. Thanks, Andreas _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"