Hi,
I have a patch against these warnings. They are the result of a function
being called with a pointer to a function rather than a string...
/otte/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../../../../contrib/gcc/c-common.c:1655:
warning: passing arg 1 of `warning' from incompatible pointer type
/otte/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../../../../contrib/gcc/c-common.c:1655:
warning: passing arg 1 of `warning' from incompatible pointer type
/otte/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../../../../contrib/gcc/c-common.c:1678:
warning: passing arg 1 of `warning' from incompatible pointer type
/otte/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../../../../contrib/gcc/c-common.c:1678:
warning: passing arg 1 of `warning' from incompatible pointer type
The patch:
--- c-common.c.orig Mon Nov 1 13:41:09 1999
+++ c-common.c Sat Apr 8 06:32:52 2000
@@ -1652,7 +1652,7 @@
/* There should be an int arg to control the string arg. */
if (params == 0)
{
- warning (tfaff);
+ tfaff ();
return;
}
if (info->first_arg_num != 0)
@@ -1675,7 +1675,7 @@
/* There should be an unsigned char * arg before the string arg. */
if (params == 0)
{
- warning (tfaff);
+ tfaff ();
return;
}
if (info->first_arg_num != 0)
Should I just send a PR ?
Patrick.
c-common.c.patch
