On 24/02/2014 10:56, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
I'd suggest openntpd as a candidate as it would require less work than
dntpd since that has some kernel changes.
In message <530b2500.5030...@rewt.org.uk>, Joe Holden writes:
Can I also suggest that ntp.org shouldn't be in the base either? :P
I absolutely agree, but the replacement is less clear in that case.
At ~400K it is pretty lightweight and doesn't listen at all by default,
suitable as a default ntpd that just maintains time - one can always
install ntp.org from ports should they need more features (such as
access control and monlist, etc)
email@example.com mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"