On 24/02/2014 10:56, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <530b2500.5030...@rewt.org.uk>, Joe Holden writes:

Can I also suggest that ntp.org shouldn't be in the base either? :P

I absolutely agree, but the replacement is less clear in that case.

I'd suggest openntpd as a candidate as it would require less work than dntpd since that has some kernel changes.

At ~400K it is pretty lightweight and doesn't listen at all by default, suitable as a default ntpd that just maintains time - one can always install ntp.org from ports should they need more features (such as access control and monlist, etc)
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to