On 24 October 2014 12:17, Konstantin Belousov <kostik...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I remember the main reason for keeping oldnfs, both server and client,
> around in HEAD was to facilitate MFC of fixes to the branches which
> still use oldnfs, i.e. stable/8. If this reason is still valid, oldnfs
> have to stay in HEAD till stable/8 is supported or interested for
> I usually do not like direct commits into the stable branches.
> Otherwise, I see no reason to keep oldnfs around.
I only see real value in that if we're actually building and testing
it on HEAD on a regular basis though. If we don't build it by default
on HEAD and don't generally test it there, I think we're actually
worse off to commit changes to HEAD first and then MFC.
email@example.com mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"