On Dec 18, 2014, at 5:02, Dimitry Andric <d...@freebsd.org> wrote:

> On 18 Dec 2014, at 02:17, NGie Cooper <yaneurab...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Dimitry Andric <d...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> ...
>>   As a request to speed up the build process further,
>>   - Would it be [easily] possible in the clang35 branch to bootstrap
>> the compiler for a specific architecture? The bootstrap / cross
>> compiler for instance always builds N targets instead of building just
>> the desired TARGET/TARGET_ARCH combo.
> 
> It's not very easy, at least not without breaking various parts of our
> fragile build system, but I surely want to put something like this on
> the TODO list for *after* the import has completed.
> 
> The branch is making progress right now, and I would not want to
> complicate matters further by introducing yet another tricky feature. :)

Fair enough :).

>>   - Could a "MK_CLANG_ALL_TARGETS" or something similar option be
>> added to src.opts.mk to fine tune this process for those of us who
>> don't want to build a cross-compile toolchain every iteration for our
>> target MACHINE/MACHINE_ARCH?
> 
> I would be fine with something like this, as long as it is turned off by
> default, or if it is only used for the bootstrap stages.  It is actually
> an extremely useful feature of clang that you can target multiple
> architectures with one compiler binary.

Yes. If make tinderbox could use this it would be useful, otherwise, for most 
folks it seems like a less interesting feature.

> A more interesting case would be to remodel the build system so it can
> use one toolchain (external, or pkg-ng'd, maybe?) for building an entire
> universe.  With clang, that should be relatively easy to do.

Agreed. bdrewery is working on something similar to that internally for Isilon. 
Building the same toolchain N times internally when building the system and 
your upstream revision of FreeBSD doesn’t change is like testing your sanity — 
not much changes with the bootstrap compiler/toolchain then!

Thanks for the reply :)!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to