On 08/25/15 12:10, Joel Dahl wrote:
>> > Seems to work. However, I cannot reproduce the user panic in the first
>> > place. What's the scenario that seems to work here? NFS seems happy
>> > with/without the patch so I'm not confident in anything we are doing her
>> > e.
> I see several patches here. Which one should I be using?
This:
Index: sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c
===================================================================
--- sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c (revision 287087)
+++ sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c (working copy)
@@ -3044,7 +3044,7 @@ em_setup_interface(device_t dev, struct adapter *a
if_setioctlfn(ifp, em_ioctl);
if_setgetcounterfn(ifp, em_get_counter);
/* TSO parameters */
- ifp->if_hw_tsomax = EM_TSO_SIZE;
+ ifp->if_hw_tsomax = IP_MAXPACKET;
ifp->if_hw_tsomaxsegcount = EM_MAX_SCATTER;
ifp->if_hw_tsomaxsegsize = EM_TSO_SEG_SIZE;
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
