On 08/29/15 00:38, Joel Dahl wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:55:02PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
>> On 08/25/15 12:10, Joel Dahl wrote:
>>>>> Seems to work. However, I cannot reproduce the user panic in the first
>>>>> place. What's the scenario that seems to work here? NFS seems happy
>>>>> with/without the patch so I'm not confident in anything we are doing her
>>> I see several patches here. Which one should I be using?
>> Index: sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c
>> --- sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c (revision 287087)
>> +++ sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c (working copy)
>> @@ -3044,7 +3044,7 @@ em_setup_interface(device_t dev, struct adapter *a
>> if_setioctlfn(ifp, em_ioctl);
>> if_setgetcounterfn(ifp, em_get_counter);
>> /* TSO parameters */
>> - ifp->if_hw_tsomax = EM_TSO_SIZE;
>> + ifp->if_hw_tsomax = IP_MAXPACKET;
>> ifp->if_hw_tsomaxsegcount = EM_MAX_SCATTER;
>> ifp->if_hw_tsomaxsegsize = EM_TSO_SEG_SIZE;
> Using this patch, my nfs server has survived several
> installkernel/installworld cycles.
Committed as svn R287330
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"