I imagine that for most users the state of graphics support for post-Haswell 
hardware is a bit of a black box so I'm sending out this note to let users know 
what they can and cannot expect. 

Wayland has actually become a reality for some. Talk to Johannes Lundberg if 
you're interested in tracking that. 

The i915 (Intel integrated GPUs) driver is currently best supported by the 
drm-next-4.7 branch. Broadwell and Skylake support is complete and some support 
came in late in the cycle for Kaby Lake. I can still consistently lock up the 
kernel in the later stages of the piglit test suite, there is no backlight 
support, and suspend/resume do not work on Skylake. The drm-next branch is 
integrated with upstream up through Linux 4.8-rc5 and thus has complete support 
for Kaby Lake, but there is a lockup in i915 that occurs some time within an 
hour of startx. This takes too long for it to have shown up in my limited 
integration smoke testing. 

The amdgpu driver is, in terms of KPI dependencies - as far as I can tell - a 
strict superset of the radeon driver. For example, when I tested my one older 
card that uses the radeon driver it manifested the same ttm bugs as amdgpu did 
at that time. Thus, when amdgpu reaches a complete working state I expect 
radeon to largely "just" work. As of this past Sunday amdgpu with the amdgpu 
DDX works with 2D, supports external monitors - selecting the appropriate 
resolution on a per display basis, and backlight works. It will also typically 
panic in ttm within ~90 minutes of startx. Although this is huge progress over 
panicking within 30s of startx (which was the case as of Saturday) or not 
starting at all due to bugs in the libdrm port a few weeks prior, it's 
obviously not something I encourage anyone to use. 

My primary motivation for starting with the work is being able to to train 
DNNs/RNNs and other model types using Theano/Caffe/Tensorflow/BidMach etc GPU 
accelerated whilst still running FreeBSD. The Radeon Open Compute stack holds 
out the promise of doing that without using the closed source CUDA stack on top 
of the Linux ABI emulation - which would inevitably be opaque and fragile. My 
plan is to keep on fixing bugs and tracking upstream until the first long term 
branch after ROC support has been integrated in to Linux mainline. I have no 
exact knowledge of when exactly that will be (AMD doesn't have sufficient 
developer resources to make any concrete guarantees) but think it should happen 
by the summer of 2017. I would like to think that by that time the i915, 
amdgpu, and radeon will be feature complete and at least as stable as the drm2 
support currently in tree. 

I need to weigh my soft commitment to make long-term DRM support happen with 
paid work and other activities which are much more important to me long term. 
Thus I've currently committed to spending every Sunday fixing bugs in the 
drm-next branches. Amdgpu is both more important to me and has gotten much less 
attention than i915. Thus I will be devoting my efforts to it in the near term. 
I'd very much welcome efforts by others to triage the issues in i915. 

Many people ask when drm-next will be available on 11. I am not a committer and 
thus have no direct say in that. However, if you are a motivated individual 
with kernel knowledge you should contact Adrian Chadd. There are a few places 
where I was not able to provide proper linuxkpi semantics without making 
(mostly quite modest) changes to sys/kern. There is a general reluctance by 
some core developers to make changes to accommodate Linux. It is possible that, 
with additional effort, the linuxkpi can both be complete enough to avoid 
needing to port the graphics drivers to FreeBSD (something clearly shown by 
past efforts to be unsustainable) and not need to make any kernel changes. If 
you would like to help with that, let Adrian know. In the meantime, TrueOS will 
continue to use my development branches for the benefit of users with newer 


freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to