and i wrote: ... |The POSIX standard says that the error condition shall be set if |a read or write error occurs only, but this should not be the case |here, no? So looking at [master]:lib/libc/stdio/fseek.c:_fseeko() |(note my machine is not strong enough to compile any compiler (but |pcc, tcc) or even operating systems, i cannot verify) there is |only one condition where the stream error indicator is set, after |the dumb: label. | |I would expect the error indicator for a failing __srefill() or |__sflush() (only: not following branches), but _here_ it is set |for a "long overflow" check failure. This looks wrong to me, but |of course: without having any idea nor test possibilities. Also |note this is 32-bit FreeBSD, can it be that /dev/null -2L,SEEK_END |sees enters 64-bit range? That also feels wrong, for /dev/null |anyway, where it should not matter and simply succeed. (The |tested OpenBSD was 32-bit, too.)
Also, the return of fseek(3) is "int", so testing LONG_MAX looks a bit odd as such, from my point of view? Ciao. --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt) _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"