John Baldwin wrote:
>
> Quick question: Is this a problem for people _without_ DEVFS?
That's a yes for me.
> non-DEVFS case. Try this hackish patch:
>
> Index: bpf.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /usr/cvs/src/sys/net/bpf.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.68
> diff -u -r1.68 bpf.c
> --- bpf.c 2000/10/09 14:19:09 1.68
> +++ bpf.c 2000/11/02 20:26:09
> @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@
> */
> if (d)
> return (EBUSY);
> - if (!dev->si_flags & SI_NAMED)
> + if (!devfs_present)
> make_dev(&bpf_cdevsw, minor(dev), UID_ROOT, GID_WHEEL, 0600,
> "bpf%d", dev2unit(dev));
> MALLOC(d, struct bpf_d *, sizeof(*d), M_BPF, M_WAITOK);
>
> Hmm. Or try doing changing it to this instead:
>
> if (dev->si_flags & SI_NAMED != 0)
>
> It could be an order of operations buglet.
Give me a couple of days to play with it...
--
Marcel Moolenaar
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel: (408) 447-4222
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
