On 02-Nov-00 Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>> Quick question: Is this a problem for people _without_ DEVFS?
>
> That's a yes for me.
>
>> non-DEVFS case. Try this hackish patch:
>>
>> Index: bpf.c
>> ===================================================================
>> RCS file: /usr/cvs/src/sys/net/bpf.c,v
>> retrieving revision 1.68
>> diff -u -r1.68 bpf.c
>> --- bpf.c 2000/10/09 14:19:09 1.68
>> +++ bpf.c 2000/11/02 20:26:09
>> @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@
>> */
>> if (d)
>> return (EBUSY);
>> - if (!dev->si_flags & SI_NAMED)
>> + if (!devfs_present)
>> make_dev(&bpf_cdevsw, minor(dev), UID_ROOT, GID_WHEEL, 0600,
>> "bpf%d", dev2unit(dev));
>> MALLOC(d, struct bpf_d *, sizeof(*d), M_BPF, M_WAITOK);
>>
>> Hmm. Or try doing changing it to this instead:
>>
>> if (dev->si_flags & SI_NAMED != 0)
>>
>> It could be an order of operations buglet.
>
> Give me a couple of days to play with it...
I already managed to test it locally here and commit the proper fix.
It was an order of operations bug due to the fact that ! is
evaluated before &.
--
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
