On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 12:23:08PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> : > I think that make has no business doing an implicit make obj for the
> : > all target.
> : Someone has to run `make obj' for the modules tree. How are you doing it
> : locally?
>
> Right now we do it twice. Once in make dpeend and again in make
> all. My patch removes it from make all.
..snip..
> I'm not sure what you're criteria for a robust world is here. If the
> directory doesn't exist, it will warn the user.
It doesn't warn the user, it errors out (possibly a suttle distinction
I'm making). Also in the past a `make depend' for the kernel was not
required. Just highly suggested. Are we really prepared to make it a
requirement now?
To tell the truth, IMHO the modules should just build in the current
directory (and thus could share some .o's with the kernel build).
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
