> The generated ld.so has bloated a bit :-) but works fine. So we could > in principle build ld.so for every release. It's just a question of > whether we should. I think we should. But it might be just as easy > to copy it off the 3.3 CD every time. It's dead end stuff after all. > > Does the release engineer have an opinion? If it's just for the compat3x distribution, I say check it into that part of lib/compat and be done with it. Uudecoding it each time is a lot easier than building it. Or are we talking about ld.so in some different context? - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Is compatibility for old aout binaries broken? Donald J . Maddox
- Re: Is compatibility for old aout binaries broken? Stephen McKay
- Re: Is compatibility for old aout binaries brok... Donald J . Maddox
- Re: Is compatibility for old aout binaries ... Stephen McKay
- Re: Is compatibility for old aout binar... Donald J . Maddox
- Re: Is compatibility for old aout ... Stephen McKay
- Re: Is compatibility for old a... Stephen McKay
- Re: Is compatibility for old a... David O'Brien
- Re: Is compatibility for o... Donald J . Maddox
- Re: Is compatibility for o... David O'Brien
- Re: Is compatibility for old a... Jordan Hubbard
- Re: Is compatibility for o... Stephen McKay
- Re: Is compatibility for old aout binaries brok... David O'Brien
- Re: Is compatibility for old aout binaries ... Donald J . Maddox
- Re: Is compatibility for old aout binar... David O'Brien
- Re: Is compatibility for old aout ... Jeremy Lea
- Re: Is compatibility for old a... Kris Kennaway
- Re: Is compatibility for o... Jeremy Lea
- Re: Is compatibility for o... John Hay
- Re: Is compatibility for old aout ... Donald J . Maddox
- Re: Is compatibility for old a... David O'Brien