On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 11:31:32AM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> <<On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 19:02:27 -0600, "Jacques A. Vidrine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > I would rather that a separate configuration file be read, for example,
> > with a list of shells(5) format files to consult.
> I would rather have a single file, located in a directory intended for
> configuration files. Perhaps we could call it ``/etc/shells'' which
> seems to be popular.
> There is no inherent virtue in having (some subset of) configuration
> files on every partition.
Actually I agree: I don't think anything needs to change. But, if a
`feature' such as this _does_ go in, I don't want it to mean that
there is a `new' format for `/etc/shells'.
Jacques Vidrine / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message