On Sunday, 11 March 2001 at 3:27:02 -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Niels Chr. Bank-Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010311 02:29] wrote:
>>
>> I'll sneak in my experience with DEVFS+vinum here as well:
>>
>> vinum: loaded
>> vinum: reading configuration from /dev/da3s1f
>> vinum: updating configuration from /dev/da1s1e
>> vinum: updating configuration from /dev/da2s1e
>> vinum: updating configuration from /dev/da0s1e
>> swapon: adding /dev/da1s1b as swap device
>> swapon: adding /dev/da2s1b as swap device
>> Automatic boot in progress...
>> /dev/da0s1a: FILESYSTEM CLEAN; SKIPPING CHECKS
>> /dev/da0s1a: clean, 406977 free (1049 frags, 50741 blocks, 0.2% fragmentation)
>> Can't stat /dev/vinum/raid01: No such file or directory
>> Can't stat /dev/vinum/raid01: No such file or directory
>> /dev/vinum/raid01: CAN'T CHECK FILE SYSTEM.
>> /dev/vinum/raid01: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY.
>>
>> This was with a -current from around March 1. (don't think
>> anything has changed since). Booting a non-DEVFS kernel
>> passes the fs-check and works as expected.
>
> Vinum+DEVFS doesn't make the million symlinks that non-devfs
> vinum does.
The only symlinks that the non-devfs version makes are to the drives.
Everything else is device nodes. But yes, it doesn't make as many
device nodes, and that is a Good Thing.
> Try using /dev/vinum/vol/raid01 instead of /dev/vinum/raid01
>
> (notice you need the '/vol/' path component)
I missed that. This is not correct. The directory /dev/vinum/vol
should go away.
Greg
--
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key
See complete headers for address and phone numbers
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
