> And to come back on topic: Portable scripts also should > _not_ assume that there are no limits on the length of > shell commands. On the other hand, portable scripts can > legitimately assume that xargs supports -i and -I, which > ours doesn't. Agreed on both counts. I guess we should fix that. > PS: FWIW, I also write a lot of awk scripts, which is my > favourite scripting language, but this is really getting > off-topic ... So do I, and you're right. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: cp -d dir patch for review (or 'xargs'?) Oliver Fromme
- Re: cp -d dir patch for review (or 'xargs'?) Sheldon Hearn
- Re: cp -d dir patch for review (or 'xargs'?) Oliver Fromme
- Re: cp -d dir patch for review (or 'xargs'?) Sheldon Hearn
- Re: cp -d dir patch for review (or 'xargs'?) Brian Dean
- Re: cp -d dir patch for review (or 'xargs'?) Oliver Fromme
- Re: cp -d dir patch for review (or 'xargs'?) Karsten W. Rohrbach
- Re: cp -d dir patch for review (or 'xargs'?) Brian Somers
- Re: cp -d dir patch for review (or 'xargs'?) Jordan Hubbard
- Re: cp -d dir patch for review (or 'xargs'?) Oliver Fromme
- Re: cp -d dir patch for review (or 'xargs'?) Jordan Hubbard
- Re: cp -d dir patch for review (or 'xargs'?) Dima Dorfman
- Re: cp -d dir patch for review (or 'xargs'?) Oliver Fromme
- Re: cp -d dir patch for review (or 'xargs'?) Brian Somers
- Re: cp -d dir patch for review (or 'xargs'?) Brian Somers
- Re: cp -d dir patch for review (or 'xargs'?) Dima Dorfman
- Re: cp -d dir patch for review (or 'xargs'?) Brian Somers
- Re: cp -d dir patch for review (or 'xargs'?) Garance A Drosihn
- Re: cp -d dir patch for review (or 'xargs'?) Dima Dorfman
- Re: cp -d dir patch for review (or 'xargs'?) Alexander Kabaev
- Re: cp -d dir patch for review (or 'xargs'?) Sheldon Hearn