In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Mike Smith  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> You're not tying up an interrupt; PCI interrupts are shared.  With the 
> new PCI code, even if you turn it off, we'll just turn it right back on 
> again. 8)

But if IRQ 5 is assigned to the uhci device, then it's not available
for use by an ISA device, is it?  Or am I all mixed up?

> The problem appears to be a bug in the UHCI driver.

Could be, and I certainly don't know much about this code.  But
it seems like the driver is being given reason to assume it has a
working device when it doesn't really have one.  I assume the device
is unusable without its interrupt, so shouldn't it fail at probe or
attach time?

  John Polstra                                               [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  John D. Polstra & Co., Inc.                        Seattle, Washington USA
  "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence."  -- Chögyam Trungpa

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to