From: Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat] Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 22:01:47 -0700 (PDT) > Symlinks do not have to contain paths. People use them for all sorts > of things so it would be totally inappropriate to put any sort of True. It would break phk's malloc debugging features to disable this, for example. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat] Bruce Evans
- Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat] Matt Dillon
- Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat] Jordan Hubbard
- Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat] Steve O'Hara-Smith
- Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat] Bruce Evans
- Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat] Steve O'Hara-Smith
- Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat] Bruce Evans
- Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat] Steve O'Hara-Smith
- Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat] Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat] Matt Dillon
- Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat] Warner Losh
- Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat] Bruce Evans
- Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat] Andrey A. Chernov