On Tue, 10 Jul 2001 19:20:23 +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > At the first glance it is not a big problem - nvi could build its own > private static DB3 library and link against it, leaving DB 1.x for libc. This is the approach that Keith's suggesting, and it makes a lot of sense. The only reasonable argument against it is the size of the vi binary in embedded systems, but that one's taken at least one direct hit on this thread. So then we're done until there's a new release of nvi. Great. :-) Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- picking a DB (Re: nvi maintainer?) mi
- Re: picking a DB (Re: nvi maintainer?) Keith Bostic
- Re: picking a DB (Re: nvi maintainer?) Mikhail Teterin
- Re: picking a DB (Re: nvi maintainer?) Keith Bostic
- Re: picking a DB (Re: nvi maintainer?) Giorgos Keramidas
- Re: picking a DB (Re: nvi maintainer?) Keith Bostic
- Re: picking a DB (Re: nvi maintainer?) Sheldon Hearn
- Re: picking a DB (Re: nvi maintainer?) Garrett Wollman
- Re: picking a DB (Re: nvi maintainer?) Maxim Sobolev
- Re: picking a DB (Re: nvi maintainer?) Sheldon Hearn
- Re: picking a DB (Re: nvi maintainer?) Tomasz Paszkowski
- Re: picking a DB (Re: nvi maintainer?) Jason Evans
- Re: picking a DB (Re: nvi maintainer?) Dag-Erling Smorgrav