On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 06:38:36PM -0500, Steve Price wrote:
> I think I might have missed part of this thread so forgive me
> if this has already been brought up.  We need to get a couple
> of package builds under our belts before this gets MFCd.  I
> seem to recall there were a couple of ports that expected libgmp
> to be around.  If so, we'll need to weed those out and either
> get them to use libmp if possible or provide libgmp as a port.

Yep; I dont think anyone is talking about MFCing this in the near
future.  libgmp3 is already a port.


PGP signature

Reply via email to