> <<On Sat, 01 Sep 2001 23:08:48 +0200, Arne Dag Fidjestøl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > But I agree, SIGINFO is not a good solution here :) > > I'm not sure who you're agreeing with, since I did not say that. I apologize for the remark, however tongue-in-cheek it was intended. Could you please clarify your position on this issue? Is setproctitle() the wrong way to do this, and if so, why? -adf To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: proctitle progress reporting for... Wilko Bulte
- Re: proctitle progress reporting for... Garrett Wollman
- Re: proctitle progress reporting for... Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group
- Re: proctitle progress reporting for... Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
- Re: proctitle progress reporting for... Garrett Wollman
- Re: proctitle progress reporting for... Arne Dag Fidjestøl
- Re: proctitle progress reportin... Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
- Re: proctitle progress reporting for... Garrett Wollman
- Re: proctitle progress reporting for... Arne Dag Fidjestøl
- Re: proctitle progress reporting for... Garrett Wollman
- Re: proctitle progress reporting for... Arne Dag Fidjestøl
- Re: proctitle progress reporting for... Mikhail Teterin
- Re: proctitle progress reporting for... Garrett Wollman
- Re: proctitle progress reporting for... Mikhail Teterin
- Re: proctitle progress reporting for... Terry Lambert
- Re: proctitle progress reporting for... Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: proctitle progress reporting for... Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: proctitle progress reporting for... Mikhail Teterin
- Re: proctitle progress reporting for... Terry Lambert
- Re: proctitle progress reporting for... Bruce Evans
- Re: proctitle progress reporting for... Mikhail Teterin