At 9:22 AM +0200 9/18/01, Mark Santcroos wrote:
>Hi Peter,
>
>What is the state of this (for i386)?
>
>Mark
>
>On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 11:24:54AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
>>  Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>>  >
>>  > Gang,
>>  >
>>  > I don't know exactly what the gdb(1) problems on Alpha are, but we
>>  > do have a problem that's probably not specific to an architecture.
>>  >
>>  > The problem is basicly this: one cannot debug any programs because
>>  > gdb(1) gets a SIGTRAP delivered when it invokes ptrace(2) and never
>>  > gets a change to wait4(2) the "interior" process.
>>  >
>>  > I don't know the details, but one of the following can be the case
>>  > 1. We now deliver a SIGTRAP, when we didn't do so before,
>>  > 2. The SIGTRAP comes too quick, it should be "caught" by the wait4(2).
>>  >
>>  > I couldn't find any indication that 1 happened, so my guess is that
>>  > we suffer from 2.
>>  >
>>  > Is this known?
>>  > Any thoughts?
>>
>>  peter has been working on this...
>>
>  > It's because the process structure and u-area have changed entirely.


I just checked in a change to fix this problem 
(sys/kern/sys_process.c v1.71). The KSE changes caused the trace 
information to be put into the debug process state instead of the 
traced process.

Mark

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to