On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 03:33:35PM -0700, Crist J. Clark wrote: > On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 12:03:02AM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: > [snip] > > > > It is not that big of a deal to hack this support for named into the > > > rc scripts. It is a hassle when considering the "correct" way to > > > handle this to make it extensible to other daemons we may wish to run > > > in such a manner. > > > > The question is what is the correct way. > > It happens I've just been hacking around in /etc/rc where the clean-up > of /var/run is done, and someone else mentioned mtree(8) in this > thread (but in a different context). I think it would be easy enough > to run mtree(8) right after /var/run is cleaned (and long after it would > be mounted as an md(4)) to get it into good form. The problem reduces > to maintaining the map file for this purpose.
It's fine for the base system but what about ports? They don't have an mtree entry but share /var/run. -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usergroup [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message