In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Silbersack w
>On Sat, 27 Oct 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> >Oops, error on my part; /proc does need to exist. So, I guess the
>> >question is this: Can devfs's error handling in the case of /dev being
>> >non-existant be improved?
>> Barely, because without /dev, how do you plan to open the console ?
>> Mkdir(/dev) isn't an option because the rootfs is mounted R/O.
>> About the only thing one could do is make init exit(bla) and get
>> a diagnostic from the kernel. It may make sense to do that.
>An error message would be sufficient; my concern was that someone
>might run into this and spend hours trying to figure out which of X
>variables was the problem.
Right, but the only way to get an error message is to let /sbin/init
die and have the kernel print the message. /sbin/init cannot
print the message when there is no "/dev/console" can it ?
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message