In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes:
>Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Silbersack
>> > Oops, error on my part; /proc does need to exist. So, I guess the
>> > question is this: Can devfs's error handling in the case of /dev being
>> > non-existant be improved?
>> Barely, because without /dev, how do you plan to open the console ?
>> Mkdir(/dev) isn't an option because the rootfs is mounted R/O.
>You could modify devfs so it can be union-mounted on top of /; or you
>could hack namei to return a fake vnode for /dev so it's always
Right, but then again, I could also stay sane :-)
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message