On Wednesday, 20 February 2002 at 18:35:37 -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Greg Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020220 18:26] wrote:
>> I'm not picking on jhb here. This is the project's fault, not any
>> individual's. We need some kind of project management to coordinate
>> this effort, or the results will be seriously suboptimal. I would
>> certainly not like to see dillon go away because it's too difficult to
>> work with the project.
> First with the code complete has it go in. Seems pretty simple
> enough doesn't it?
Too simple. It's not the "code complete", it's the correct code to
implement a part of the overall goal. And we should be working
together, not duplicating each other's efforts.
> I've had quite enough of people telling others to hold off because
> "i'll have the feature any day now", or "that fix is in my local
That's a detail, though admittedly one that needs to be addressed. We
have more serious issues. Last Friday I asked for an overall project
plan, and I still haven't seen one. Yes, we had some useful
discussions, but it's still not enough. If it took Sun 8 years of
(relatively) careful project planning to get their SMP up to a
reasonable standard, how can we hope to succeed if we don't even
decide what we're trying to do?
Two years ago I spoke with you on the phone about SMP, and said that I
didn't think that the project could cope with such a pervasive change.
That's why I was happy when BSD[Ii] dropped both the design and the
code into our lap, and we had an SMP project manager (for all of 6
months). Looking back now, we're making the same old mistakes.
See complete headers for address and phone numbers
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message