Hmm. Well, part of the goal of the upcoming development snapshots is to provide that. On the other hand, I think the reason there has been less focus on that of late is that -CURRENT is actually quite stable, leaving aside a few tiny windows (for example, when I broke booting due to messing up a locking case in vn_close() during a merge from a local tree). As we move towards a less stable tree, the best approach may be to announce good "times" to request of cvsup/CVS, to avoid the cost of the tagging operation.
Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project [EMAIL PROTECTED] NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, George V. Neville-Neil wrote: > Hi Folks, > I'm wondering if anyone has been laying down periodic "good" tags in > -CURRENT so that people who are just starting with it have a place to start > that is reasonably stable. Yes, I know about -STABLE but that's not what I > mean. > > Thanks, > George > > -- > George V. Neville-Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED] > NIC:GN82 > > "Those who would trade liberty for temporary security deserve neither" > - Benjamin Franklin > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
