At Sat, 30 Mar 2002 11:02:47 +0100,
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
> >In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Malone writes:
> >>On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 09:59:29AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >>> This is an interesting machine: A K6 wiht ACPI, havn't seen that
> >>> before.
> >>
> >>I had one of these machines and concluded that the ACPI time counter
> >>was busted. I dunno if it is possible to sanity check the time
> >>counter before using it? I just switched to using the TSC early in
> >>boot and forgot about it.
> >
> >That is what I try to do, and I recently rewrote the code in current
> >for that exact reason, so I'm very interested in seeing the diagnostic
> >output (boot -v) from a -current kernel on these motherboards.
> I've stared at the data file and I'll be damned if I can find anything
> which would case the clock to double its speed :-(

Perhaps something else is causing the clock to run twice as fast?
Maybe two things that are working properly are both incrementing
the clock? 

> -- 
> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to