On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> hi,
>
> heck, was it hard for me (a person who never used freebsd) to find the
> right address ... nah, whatever. :)
>
> src/lib/libc_r/uthread/uthread_init.c
> some time ago you commited a workaround for processes with pid 1 (and no
> stdio). unfortunately, this won't catch programs started directly from
> init (in my case it was kdm). they have no stdio set up as well, so they
> will experience major havoc, too. i'm not sure about the check, though -
> just test, if ppid == 1?
> in my case the problem was building kdm with -pthread in the first place,
> but still this should be fixed.
Anyone know what to do for this problem? Here's what libc_r
does for pid == 1:
/*
* Check for the special case of this process running as
* or in place of init as pid = 1:
*/
if (getpid() == 1) {
/*
* Setup a new session for this process which is
* assumed to be running as root.
*/
if (setsid() == -1)
PANIC("Can't set session ID");
if (revoke(_PATH_CONSOLE) != 0)
PANIC("Can't revoke console");
if ((fd = _thread_sys_open(_PATH_CONSOLE, O_RDWR)) < 0)
PANIC("Can't open console");
if (setlogin("root") == -1)
PANIC("Can't set login to root");
if (_thread_sys_ioctl(fd,TIOCSCTTY, (char *) NULL) == -1)
PANIC("Can't set controlling terminal");
if (_thread_sys_dup2(fd,0) == -1 ||
_thread_sys_dup2(fd,1) == -1 ||
_thread_sys_dup2(fd,2) == -1)
PANIC("Can't dup2");
}
Is it valid to check for ppid == 1 and do the same thing?
--
Dan Eischen
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
