Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 5 May 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > Yep, these modules don't exist in -STABLE.  You should keep your old
> > /etc/pam.conf around for -STABLE programs.
>       I thought that pam ignored pam.conf if /etc/pam.d exists?

-CURRENT's PAM does, -STABLE's doesn't.

>                                                                 Or are
> you saying that I should make /etc/pam.d/xdm look just like the old
> settings?  I'm happy to test ideas to try and make this work, but I don't
> really know anything about pam.

Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to