* Juli Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020629 06:31] wrote:
> * Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escriuréres
> > The work is really nice, but the timing sounds rather bad, is there
> Thanks.
> > a way you can either commit it earlier or after you return from
> > hiatus?
> I can commit it a few weeks from now, or I can commit it five minutes
> from now.  I just don't want it going in with any architectural deficiency
> hanging over its head, and so I wanted to give adequate time for review,
> if such seems necessary.  Really I can commit while out of town, but if
> any changes need made because of said review, I wouldn't want to commit,
> as (as mentioned) I'll be unable to test (outside of compiles).

I think if you committed it sunday night that would be fine, that's
plenty of time for people to get a look at it, especially considering
this is being proposed over the weekend.

It also gives you two days to correct any issues should they come up.

-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
 start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
Tax deductible donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to