On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
> >This is mostly because resources have been diverted away from updating
> >working code to write a second system.
> Make that third system, the current slice/label code is our second
> system, and I don't think the resources have been diverted as much
> as defected.
> Either way, I know you don't want either of DEVFS or GEOM, I think
> I know where you come from, I just happen to not agree that we
> should stay stuck back there.

I disagree that DEVFS and GEOM are forwards.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to