On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 12:37:14PM -0700, Lamont Granquist wrote:
> > It sounds like gcc-3.1 or gcc-3.2 will be archaic and buggy
> > by the time that 5.2 and 5.3 come out.
> How would gcc-3.2 get more buggy over time than it is today??

I said it was buggy.  Do you mean to imply that gcc-3.2 doesn't have a
single bug in it?

Admittedly I should have said "unmaintained" though -- point being that
the bugs in it wouldn't be getting fixed by gcc developers who would
rather fix them in 3.3...

> "archaic" does apply however.
> Why the fsck can't people come up to speed on an issue before spewing
> FUD?

I fail to see why assuming that a software project the size of the gcc
compiler has a few bugs is "FUD"...

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to