At 11:23 AM -0200 2002/12/09, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:

 I do see one contraindication to this behavior. Most routing protocols
 also react badly to time changes. Egg and chicken problem, but,
 personally, and running OSPF, which is one of those protocols that react
 badly to time changes, I find it preferably to run the router first.
IIRC, ntpd should not cause large-scale changes to the time that might wreak havoc with your router. It should only be making changes in the rate at which the clock ticks, so as to speed it up or slow it down, to the point where you are more or less in sync with your reference(s). It would be ntpdate that would be the potentially dangerous one making large-scale changes to your system time.

Therefore, you definitely want the router stuff before the ntpd stuff.

--
Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.

GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E W+++(--) N+ !w---
O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message


Reply via email to