On 27-Feb-2003 Garance A Drosihn wrote: >>I doubt the usefulness of this. i386 kernels were just accidentally >>broken for almost a month and a half without anyone noticing. >>People wouldn't have noticed if phk@ hadn't asked for a volunteer >>either. I386_CPU kernel compiles have been broken in the past for >>rather long periods of time before being noticed as well. > > Well, doesn't that suggest that it would be GOOD if the release > process itself had to build a GENERIC_I386 kernel?
It points out that no one uses I386 kernels. Is it more valuable to have GENERIC_I386 or KDE on disc 1? If it came down to that I would pick KDE. -- John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
