Terry Lambert writes:
> Mark Murray wrote:
> > Will it be runnable (as in tested), rather than a compile-only fix?
> 
> Is "tested" a requirement fo code to be committed or to have it
> stay in the tree?

Both.

> Be careful of your answer, unless you are willing to remove all
> code that does not meet that criteria...

Be careful of your interpretation of my answer. State _all_ your
premises, and be careful not to use any undeclared ones. Do not hold
me to any premise that I have not agreed to.

All broken code needs to be fixed XOR removed. All fixes need to be
tested. All code in the tree needs to be tested often to ensure that
it is not broken.

M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to