On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 12:14:39AM -0000, Duncan Barclay wrote: > > From: "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > I'll seriously argue against the 2nd point above. I don't know of a > > SINGLE person that uses /bin/sh as their interactive shell when > > multi-user. Not ONE. Every Bourne shell'ish user I've ever met uses > > Bash, AT&T ksh, pdksh, zsh. > > I don't know anyone that farms lama's, so there cannot be any lama farmers.
One has to make a strong statement to get the people to come out of the woodwork. > computer$ grep dmlb /etc/passwd > dmlb:*:1166:1166:Duncan Barclay:/home/dmlb:/bin/sh Good. Now do you need NSS support? Do the benefits of supporting NSS in /bin/sh for you out-weigh the performance issue of building it dynamically? Couldn't you just as easily use the pdksh port? -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
