Alexander Leidinger <[email protected]> wrote: > Quoting Emanuel Haupt <[email protected]> (from Sat, 26 Feb 2011 > 12:58:14 +0100): > > > The distilator [1] shows that roughly 97% by a total of109969 all > > referenced distfiles fail to download. Resulting in countless > > timeouts. > > > > Excerpt from the most recent run: > > > > Maintainer ok bad % bad > > [email protected] 1005 45696 97.85% > > [email protected] 1691 61577 97.33% > > > Ideas? > > Would it help to change the order of the master site list? I assume > that there are some which have everything.
Unfortunately that wouldn't be much help to people who use MASTER_SORT. I believe the best way would be to cleanup Mk/bsd.sites.mk. In particular MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX. ports-mgmt/distilator can help identifying those sites. For instance: $ distilator /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10/ Result: http://people.freebsd.org/~ehaupt/misc/linux_base-f10-distilator.log.gz A quick check would suggests to only keep: $ zcat linux_base-f10-distilator.log.gz | grep ^200 | awk '{print $3}' \ | perl -e 'use URI; while(<>) { chomp(); $u=URI->new($_); print $u->host . "\n"; }' \ | sort | uniq archives.fedoraproject.org ftp.quicknet.nl ftp.rhd.ru ftp.udl.es mirror.steadfast.net ...but reducing MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX to those hosts shows that not even those mirrors are consistent. Hence my prior suggestion to get a complete set of all distfiles needed by ports using MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX and mirror those on reliable mirrors. I can assume that task if that's fine with emulation@ :-) Emanuel _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
