Alexander Leidinger <[email protected]> wrote: > Quoting Emanuel Haupt <[email protected]> (from Mon, 28 Feb 2011 > 10:15:41 +0100): > > > Alexander Leidinger <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Quoting Emanuel Haupt <[email protected]> (from Sat, 26 Feb 2011 > >> 12:58:14 +0100): > >> > >> > The distilator [1] shows that roughly 97% by a total of109969 all > >> > referenced distfiles fail to download. Resulting in countless > >> > timeouts. > >> > > >> > Excerpt from the most recent run: > >> > > >> > Maintainer ok bad % bad > >> > [email protected] 1005 45696 97.85% > >> > [email protected] 1691 61577 97.33% > >> > >> > Ideas? > >> > >> Would it help to change the order of the master site list? I assume > >> that there are some which have everything. > > > > Unfortunately that wouldn't be much help to people who use > > MASTER_SORT. > > Yes. > > > I believe the best way would be to cleanup Mk/bsd.sites.mk. In > > particular MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX. > > I plan to have a look at a more recent linux distribution for our > linux_base. If I get the time, and if it will be fedora based > (probably it will, as it may make the update a little bit more > easy), this may mean the list will go back to what it was... > > > ports-mgmt/distilator can help identifying those sites. For > > instance: > > > > $ distilator /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10/ > > > > Result: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~ehaupt/misc/linux_base-f10-distilator.log.gz > > > > A quick check would suggests to only keep: > > $ zcat linux_base-f10-distilator.log.gz | grep ^200 | awk '{print > > $3}' \ > > | perl -e 'use URI; while(<>) { chomp(); $u=URI->new($_); > > | print > > $u->host . "\n"; }' \ > > | sort | uniq > > > > archives.fedoraproject.org > > ftp.quicknet.nl > > ftp.rhd.ru > > ftp.udl.es > > mirror.steadfast.net > > > > ...but reducing MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX to those hosts shows that > > not even those > > mirrors are consistent. Hence my prior suggestion to get a complete > > :( > > > set of all distfiles > > needed by ports using MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX and mirror those on > > reliable mirrors. > > Should be easy to do (if a mirror is available). > > > I can assume that task if that's fine with emulation@ :-) > > I am fine with this. I try to deprecate the linux*f[6789]* ports > this week (I have to make up my mind if it will be one or two months > of grace time). If you just spend the time to have a look at the fc4 > and f10 ones, everything should arrive at a sane situation after the > expiration date.
Ok, I think I'll look into it. I might wait until you're trough with expiring the said ports. Thanks for your feedback. Emanuel _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
