On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Jung-uk Kim <j...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 2013-12-16 14:57:55 -0500, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: >> >> Yes I am aware of that and if you look at the commit history you >> will see that I have tried to fix that issue with the last commit. >> It has fixed the issue for a couple of vbox binaries (VBoxSVC, >> VBoxManage) but some are still broken. (VBoxHeadless, VirtualBox) >> >> The conflicts entry for compat9x was there already and I will need >> to add it again as it seems. > > BTW, I have a real fix for the problem, i.e., build with Clang (well, > as much as possible). In fact, only couple of files (under > src/recompiler) are absolutely needed to be compiled with GCC in > 4.3.x. Therefore, there is no need for libstdc++.so dependency at all. > > Here are my experimental ports (based on official vbox@ ports, i.e., > https://redports.org/browser/virtualbox/emulators) > > http://redports.org/browser/jkim/emulators
Probably I don't understand what you want to archive but I don't think patching virtualbox to compile 95% of it with clang and still having to compile the remaining 5% with gcc is of any benefit. We need to carry all the clang patches in our port which makes it a big beast and have likely no chance to get those workarounds included upstream because they won't accept patches for a compiler that can't fully build vbox. The issue that this thread talks about can be fixed in a much simpler way. In fact the VBoxHeadless and VirtualBox binaries do not have a RPATH at all - so all we need to do is fix the vbox buildsystem to add the RPATH to those binaries too like they already do for VBoxSVC and VBoxManage. -- Bernhard Froehlich http://www.bluelife.at/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
