:(Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) :Matt's point, which he's not making by virtue of talking too much, is :that you can't make a "no overcommit" system behave like an "overcommit" :system, and most people are used to the sort of things that the latter :makes practical. Heh heh. -Matt Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Noriyuki Soda
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Noriyuki Soda
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Ted Faber
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Ted Faber
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Kris Kennaway
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Gregory Sutter
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Mike Smith
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Noriyuki Soda
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Noriyuki Soda
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Noriyuki Soda
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Brian F. Feldman
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Valentin Nechayev
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Valentin Nechayev
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Matthew Dillon