>>>>> On Tue, 13 Jul 1999 17:25:21 -0700 (PDT),
Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> With today's modern high capacity disk drives, a properly configured
> multi-user system will have enough swap that running it out is difficult
> to say the least.
That's wrong.
Please remember that you said "assuming hostile users", a hostile
user can run the machine out of swap generally easier than crashing
the machine. Your example of IRC server is just one of exceptions.
If you find a bug which crashes FreeBSD, isn't it better fix the bug?
Why do you stick at not fixing the problem.
--
soda
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (p... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (p... Ted Faber
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (p... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (p... Ted Faber
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (p... Kris Kennaway
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (p... Gregory Sutter
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (p... Mike Smith
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (p... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (p... Noriyuki Soda
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (p... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (p... Noriyuki Soda
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (p... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (p... Noriyuki Soda
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (p... Brian F. Feldman
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (p... Valentin Nechayev
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (p... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part ... Valentin Nechayev
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (p... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Valentin Nechayev
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Jason Thorpe

